A Deeper Meaning to
So, back to the word “welcome.”  What catches my attention is that its first vowel is now an “e” … Why?  It could be from the vowel changes occurring to relieve handwriting problems of misread scribe entries moving from Old to Middle English.  But the only documented vowel change is “u” to “o” so that does not really answer it.  My observation is that the implication of “my will” is removed.  
ME  to WE
flip me
So of the word “welcome,” I see it embrace the “we” at its very beginning. At its end, I see it command a responsibility upon the me. That sense of welcome, that sense of sharing, that sense of we … in the end, it depends upon “me.” It is the me in all of us that must flip to be a “w” of we, and enable welcome.

     Though hardly a grammarian, I, being that I am, look at words with a different mindset. At times, I wonder where a word might have come from and what it really meant in days of origin. One such word that recently caught my attention is “welcome.” So I looked up its etymology.
     Okay, so in its beginnings we have: “from earlier wilcuma (n.) "welcome guest," literally "one whose coming suits another's will
or wish," from willa "pleasure, desire, choice" (see will (n.)) + cuma "guest," related to cuman (see come).”
Online Etymology Dictionary -

      Again okay, it makes sense; it was as “my will [pleasure] that one be my guest.” Yet, in the etymology of the word “come,” there is no reference to “guest.” Ironically, in personal usage, I will often singularly state “come” as meaning, “be with me.”  Yet, I cannot find any such definitive referral to such usage. I have no clue where my usage came from.
     And yet, I see in the word as currently written, a message that rings dear to my heart. We live in a world of me-me-me.  Many times, I see people as Me-Me Birds; it exemplifies that trend in our humanity. My battle cry, as written in “Like the Fruit of the Vine…”* is, “What will it take to flip the “m” of me to the “w” of we?” And for me, there is little more precious than the oneness of “we.”
*Opens in a new window
     Even in this very font, an artistic symbolization appears in the difference between an “m” and a “w.” In lowercase, the “m” is a sheltering design shaped to hold nothing that may pour forth upon it. In uppercase, it does form a vessel shape to receive deeply, but singularly. It is all about the “me,” the ego self. The contrasting “w” in lowercase and uppercase forms joined vessels shaped as one. Each side may fill to the brim and spill over into the other. It is a joined essence; a singular form of two parts as one; and in that, the “w” is open to share.
For me, such is my will, by command, and, my pleasure.

That there be we, can you uproot the feet of an “m?”
Except for reference material as annotated herein, the collective content of this website is copyrighted by GuruJah.org.
Your respect of that is appreciated. If you desire to use our content from this site, please ask.
Thank you, Guru Jah here … ©1998 – 2015

Visits since 5/16/2015
We welcome any and all comments, questions, and dialog
to encourage everyone's deeper understanding.
Guru Jah here ...
Related Pages:

Snippets of Wisdom on Acceptance
​​​Snippets of Wisdom on Forgiving
Snippets of Wisdom on Seeing and Hearing
Less a Home           A look at acceptance​
          Links open in a new window or tab​​